China
View country profileWhat has the NWS done so far (prior to the current Review Cycle)?
What is the NWS doing on this action in the current Review Cycle?
Sources
France
View country profileWhat has the NWS done so far (prior to the current Review Cycle)?
France is a party to four protocols of the treaties establishing NWFZs. In addition to the Antarctic Treaty of 1959 (which provides for complete demilitarisation), France is a party to the protocols of the Treaty of Tlatelolco (ratified in 1974 and 1992), the Treaty of Rarotonga (ratified in 1996), the Treaty of Pelindaba (ratified in 1996) and the Treaty of Semipalatinsk (joined in 2014) establishing nuclear-weapon-free zones in Latin America and the Caribbean, the Pacific, Africa and Central Asia, respectively. France also recognised Mongolia’s status as a nuclear-weapon-free zone in 2012.
France expressed its support for the project of a WMD free zone in the Middle East. France participated, as an observer state, in the first three Conferences (2019, 2021, and 2022) on the establishment of a zone free of weapons of mass destruction and their means of delivery in the Middle East, which have been held in New York since 2019 pursuant to United Nations General Assembly Resolution 73/546.
What is the NWS doing on this action in the current Review Cycle?
France supported UNGA Resolution A/RES/78/39, on the Treaty on a nuclear free zone in Southeast Asia (Bangkok Treaty) and indicates that it continues to discuss with ASEAN member states to find an acceptable solution enabling the signature of the protocol of the Bangkok Treaty.
Regarding the project of a WMD free-zone in the Middle East, France took part to the 4th (2023) and 5th (2024) Conference on the Establishment of a Middle East Zone Free of Nuclear Weapons and Other Weapons of Mass Destruction.
France also supports and contributes to the European Union’s efforts to achieve this objective, notably through EU Council Decision of 26 June 2023, which allocated a budget of nearly €2.1 million to promote trust and dialogue. France also supports the work of the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR), which aims at promoting inclusive dialogue between experts and policy makers on this issue.
Sources
National Report submitted by France. Report submitted by France under actions 5, 20 and 21 of the Final Document of the 2010 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (2022–2026). NPT/CONF.2026/PC.III/2. 7 March 2025, https://docs.un.org/en/NPT/CONF.2026/PC.III/2
Russia
View country profileWhat has the NWS done so far (prior to the current Review Cycle)?
What is the NWS doing on this action in the current Review Cycle?
Sources
United Kingdom
View country profileWhat has the NWS done so far (prior to the current Review Cycle)?
What is the NWS doing on this action in the current Review Cycle?
Sources
United States
View country profileWhat has the NWS done so far (prior to the current Review Cycle)?
Of the five major Nuclear Weapons Free Zones (NWFZ), the United States has only ratified the protocols of one: the Treaty of Tlatelolco, which banned nuclear weapons in Latin America and the Caribbean. The United States has signed, but not ratified, the protocols of the Rarotonga Treaty, the Pelindaba Treaty, and the Semipalatinsk Treaty. The Obama administration submitted the protocols for all three treaties to the Senate in 2011 and 2015; however, they all remain stalled with the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. The United States, like the other Nuclear Weapon States, has not signed the Bangkok Treaty.
Negotiations over a Middle East WMD-Free Zone have been stalled, in part due to the United States’ insistence upon regional consensus and resistance of language that it believes would single out Israel. This issue was one of the key reasons why the 2015 Review Conference did not achieve consensus on an outcome document.
What is the NWS doing on this action in the current Review Cycle?
During the current Review Cycle, the United States continued to advocate publicly for regional nuclear-weapons-free zones (NWFZ), noting in a statement that they “provide the most expeditious and practical way to extend legally binding negative security assurances.” Despite its public advocacy, the United States Senate has not achieved success in ratifying any of the three NWFZ protocols under consideration during the current Review Cycle.
Sources
U.S. Department of State (Obama Administration). “Nuclear Weapon Free Zones.” Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation. https://2009-2017.state.gov/t/isn/anwfz/index.htm
United Nations. “2015 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.” United Nations Office for Disarmament Affairs, 27 April–22 May 2015. https://www.un.org/en/conf/npt/2015/.
Turner, Bruce. “Statement by the United States to the NPT Preparatory Committee: Cluster One Specific Issue Statement.” U.S. Department of State, July 25, 2024. https://2021-2025.state.gov/statement-by-the-united-states-to-the-npt-preparatory-committee-cluster-one-specific-issue-statement/.